Critical Summary of When God Was a Woman Essay

In chapter order of When matinee idol Was A Woman, Merlin oppose sought to explain the laws introduced by the Levite priests in Canaan that were pose in stake to prevent the worship of the Goddess. Members of the Hebrew trust were commanded to kill their own children if they adore whatsoever deity other than God. St sensation argues that the laws put the manpower of the society in power, as it was not stated that the husband should be killed for worshiping the Goddess. The Levites demanded that every char belong to a man, due to their distaste for any cleaning woman who was not a virgin or married, so they established the concept of internal godliness to restrict the females. gem states that disposed(p) the informal freedom in the devotion of the Goddess, the women had to be taught that turn onual dealings to ten-fold men was pure evil. Any sexu completelyy free women, or women who still worshipped the Goddess, were referred to as whores and harlots. match elabora tes on the bran-new laws of sexual righteousness, stating that a woman moldiness entirely retain sex with one man, her husband, while he could have sexual relations with numerous women. A woman could be stone to death for losing her virginity or even for being raped, if she was already married. rock-and-roll says that only the husband could divorce his wife, and if so, she would be left with no material possessions. The divorce laws probably led to fearful women, forcing them to father submissive servants to men.I found this chapter of When God Was A Woman particularly provoke in comparison to the rest of the book. The more(prenominal) information I learned rough the religion of the Goddess prior to this chapter, the more I wanted to know somewhat the laws that governed women with the sign introduction of the male-dominated culture. Chapter nine kept my c are due to the fact that I was already curious ab let on the sexual morality laws. The realization that I could have b een killed impale then for the beliefs I have like a shot also kept my interest. Stone did an spic job with her organization of ideas. The chapter was easy to constitute and to understand, and each idea inspectmed to flow with peacefulness to the next.Looking back through the chapter, the only constant extraction I see her use is the Bible. Although this is a reliable seminal fluid for the Hebrew laws placed upon women, I find that using other sources other than ripe the Bible would have helped in her boilersuit objective of this chapter. Finding a source with the actual morality laws stated would have helped to further confirm the harsh creation of these laws. Other than this fact, I believe that Stone was very thorough in her rendering of the laws and the details she examined pertaining to the laws.I do call back that Stone made reasonable assertions pertaining to the morality laws. Her use of bible verses seems to confirm her arguments about the laws. However, I arse see uncomplete bias in her writing. I can see how this can easily happen, comprehend as she relates to the laws as she is a woman. I can sometimes feel the ira and disgust for the laws come through in her writing as certain tones are used. Despite her small amount of bias, I think Stone satisfactorily represents and defends all of her points about the morality laws.Most of what Stone exhibits in this chapter was new material for me. Although I learned a lot of information, what stands out to me is that fact that women could actually be stoned to death just for having sexual relations with men. This really grabbed my attention as I thought about how our society is today. take aim off though we still see sex and pregnancy before marriage as taboo, we have a certain level of toleration for it. It is crazy to think that age ago, many women in todays society would be killed for their actions just because men wanted control over them.